MC Hammer

Judd Legum
MC~club? /Media Charlie Roar Shed?
OK, there is some de~men~shun~alism* here. 
There is the mountain and the waco?  
The inspiration? 
What is the difference between a Gang and the GOP?**
* sometimes know as dimentionalism[!]
** long story short, I dissolved the media circus(Re~MC)

SPOILER ALERT:
[It gets rough if you smart off to them.]

Footnotes Page JUNE 2014 Page 3

Papa Bush is on the links or in the gulf. 
[But back to the fuzzyness:-)... tactics, strategies, sheds]

From Some to These?

"some people" are not "these people" 
It is a run for the meme or a tool shed.

~~
Jared?

Initialism

Not to pun on Recreationism [!]

But Crypto Political Science deals with a more dimentional political spectrum of global exceptionionalism.  (FP1)

(not there yet)
In the begining...
Long Story

BLANK NETWORK (scroll click){Paper U?}
{Re insert} Speaking of Pre Post or Us ... Knowwww!!!!*

* Colbert Daft Anachronism
(MSNBC search for "Failed States" flailed bridges)

{OK, the original sentiment is that there is politics of a third kind^.  Not just the libertarian(6) , but international perspectives (14) that clash with the old partisan ships. The glint of tinfoil(17) is actually a tool in the shed of progress that cannot be emptied by executive order**.  There is a war on terrorism, it was declared by congress, and the president is the commander-in-chief.  It is tough enough dealing (f.c.)^^ with adversarial states, let alone protect America from it's legacy(such as it is)*** in a world that is changing, from the global to the local.  Crypto Political Science as I have coined it relates, to the wise crack of perception being reality.  Knot[!] to mention, truth being the first casualty in war.  It his hard enough dealing with a divided congress, let alone pre-constitutional or crypto-political organizations.}

** Ctrl F/papa
*** history in general/leading in particular(b.s.)
[OBAMA AM/Tonight Show: Changing the box ... of Tetra Heed Run.]

^ Embassy closings cover for actions or prudence in the unfolding middle-c of Turkey and Yemen?  [To The Point ?]
(The Point *link* is yet to be inserted: an NPR report on Terrorism.  A tangent? Who would be the counter-balance to Alan Simpson?  But where is Joe Scarborough? LET ALONE THE CYCLE.) 

[8-9-13 P.S.] ^^(f.c.)4ment change see (6)th link "dimentional". Let alone the Point !

Footnotes Page4 August 2013

8-5-13 [?]: (s.c.) a.  Fiddle Sticks^ , b., c., d. e., f. Moos Room /?
A for August need to ReVamp Heading {see brackets next}

{8-9-13} The Oh Gen Duh?(b.s.) a.(Brackets and the Debt Clock), b., c.(The Curve or Nuance Thing), d.(Woof Woof?), e. Two Evils? Or flippin flop?, f., g., h.Game+Lock, i., J. Trouble with the Curve?  { ! )

8-22-13  Teddy Bull and Pit Bull @ UOB: U- A.Connecting the Dots, B, C,  D.No Teddy[!], The Straw Bear / B-. A., b.Connecting the Dots, C. /// Tool Shed- A.Inconvenient , B., The Real B. S. of the F. C., Nail Meet F--C---[!], E.Irony versus Hypocrisy

8-26-13: Lemon Ship *** Pun on Aster Risks (To Ctrl F Initialism) A. Conservative Foray (4A) B. Initialism, C. Democracy Upheld! (5-4) (R/x)** , D.Child's Play   

8-28-13 A Black and White Chat is not about colors or races, but spectrums, polarities(knot exactly), and dimentions.

Pun it?

Somewhere* there is embedded a pecarious parsing**.  In actuality, and I don't mean "knot", but darn may be closer.  But that is a tan gent.

Rather than (FP!)*** I will list "some"(the above) links:
"Somewhere" / Game+Lock
"darn" / (b.s.) "we+weave"
"closer" / (b.s.) "delta+dawn"
"that" / Reading List (UC)
"tan gent" / Martin Bashir: Walsh & Alter

* not necessarily this link
** the parsing was an actual placement of the word "pun" in some link
*** (irony / not it)
[nor delta darn?]

A.  I have yet to locate the "pun" embedded in "some" link
B.  Earlier parsing or heading considered: Tool Shed.  Referencing pun on shedding (housing, dropping) To house, to drop. Well prior to The Cycle's "Fight or Flight."  "Panacea"? Pan a C-ya! (e.g. / i.e. ?)

FOOTNOTES FEBRUARY 2013

2-1-13 Trilemmas and Cultural Calculus :
Fishkin's http://www.philosophy-of-education.org/uploads/papers2011/Bamfield.pdf, Trilemma http://www.utm.edu/staff/jfieser/class/410-pol/pojman-outline.htm, 4M Try Lemmings,
in tent  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trilemma, Mean  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trilemma#Trilemmas_in_economics,
...   http://www.nytimes.com/2010/07/11/business/economy/11view.html?_r=0,
?  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trilemma#Trilemmas_in_economics, ?  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liberal_paradox,
easy  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tetralemma, at  http://www.thelogician.net/3b_buddhist_illogic/3b_chapter_01.htm,
least  http://forum.wolframscience.com/showthread.php?s=16f6647f676b31bf8e738901daabc68a&threadid=1927,
loosely  http://political_progress_for_people.blogspot.com/search?q=tetrahedron+of+will,
drafting  http://political_progress_for_people.blogspot.com/search?q=math+is+next+,
un- http://political_progress_for_people.blogspot.com/search?q=math+is+next,
M  http://www.facebook.com/roger.larson.58/timeline/2013/1,
bedding  http://political_progress_for_people.blogspot.com/search?q=godliness,
tan http://www.facebook.com/roger.larson.58/timeline/2013/1#!/JohnHenryLG/posts/484801448229006?comment_id=5254201&offset=0&total_comments=13,
gent  http://www.facebook.com/roger.larson.58/timeline/2013/1#!/suzette.sommer.9/posts/4281975535675?comment_id=57783597&offset=0&total_comments=29 *,
shall  http://www.newyorker.com/online/blogs/books/2012/07/david-and-goliath.html,
2-4-13 *source or 4moolah 4  the platonic 4M.

2-4-13 Quoth the...
Brackets and the Debt Clock under the "birds"(sc)
not : (b.s  pen+dull+em) a Pluto, Plato, and the Pen Dull'em (sc), b Failure is always (sc), c Go Left Young Man! , d  Slippery Slope (sc).
else: (b.s. poe) Fair and Balanced... (sc)

2-5-13 Flack...Oh
and blame : War on Tea Party?
  gaming. (b.s. share+n+angle) Mitt's BO*Son, BlogSpot Has A New "Blogger", Try Lemmings, Bring It On!, Cautious Black Friday!!!!, Jeb Bush is full of Cow Pie!, "FACT: References To Al Qaeda Were Removed To Protect National Security ...", War of the Skirts, The Hope'd4 Campaign, Who Let the Dogs Out?, Clinton(Bill) is full of B.S. .

2-11-13 Owe(b.s)= Post-Pyth, Post-Pyth, Post "don't ask, don't tell"^ ? (d'oh=sc),Post "don't ask, don't tell"^ ?  / OW=?(under al gore rhythm of pyth)4 later search or earlier brackets ! (Ctrl F "hood")

2-12-13 update, *FP4*, *FP3*, LEGEND PAGE, Format Change , Updates
2-12-13 Carpe Diem! Seize the Day? Latin 4...

2-13-13  D-Day *seams* = pun on *sowing* seems to thread in Lincoln and Darwin's birthday.  Further, I should let you work it "into the grand picture of how things work".(FP2)

2-14-13 SOTU label/[**] & subheading edit after Tea Kettle Sports[!]
TKS[!]: Fry/Pan{L} pun on gaming politics.(OW) you(sc) Hint: NCAA/Olypics/CAPitalization[!]
(b.s.)"PBMP" A.,  B.What the Beck? (sc), C. Follow-up and Flip-Flop (sc)  D. Follow-up and Flip-Flop  E. Proof of Process? F. Looking Back, and Moving On. (sc) G. Geometry of Purpose (sc) N F L [!] (F P too?)

2-15-13  HAPPY V-DAY!  Note the anachronism of con sciousness & science.

2-18-13 Technical Difficulties!   "Where": A. Follow-up (sc) , B. What Obama can't say. (sc), C. What the Beck? (sc)  /   "inter": Score Won...  / "tubes": A. As the Inner Tubes (sc) , B. Table of Contents  (Senator)
** "Rush"(pun) / "ah!": A. WTF?, B. The Hope, C. Why OWS is bigger than Left vs. Right. (sc)
"foundations": A. Science Fiction Writers, B. Four More Years!, C. Slash Segue (sc), D. Notes from Al-Qaeda .

2-19-13 Splitting Rails... to
"Share": Technical Difficulties! 
"'n": HAPPY V-DAY! 
"Angles.": Garry Wills "(c)atholicism" The Cycle
"Not ": (b.s.)"yogurt" C. Pop Yogurt[!]
"just": Harvard class on Tarantino.
"President's": ladders of opportunity
"pastime": Three Shed Monte 

2-23-13: OW?  Unspinning Charlotte! 6., 5.(Wills), 4.Future Bubble?, 3.(b.s.), 2., 1. Gnaught ?  [FP2]

2-26-13 under(stands?) or PEG legs?
Preface to FOOTNOTES OCTOBER 2012, Simon says... , The History of B.S.,
What the Beck?  BS-Table?

2-28-12 ...SCrolls: Lap Top?  No Tab Let's. Krauthammer / Walsh (Breaking Bread?)(FP3)

House of Cards

Rock, Paper, Scissors.

Try Angle.

In the Mix.

Not to rant**,

but the Tetrahedron of Will* is involved in the balance of Science and Religion.

They are not on the same field, except as a tool and a wood shed.

* from tetrahedron

** no particular link

[An aphorisms razor to ponder. In pre-emptive context ?]

[A double decker! Or upper decker?]

[4-3-12: Will "instantiation"*** wrought or rot our foundation.

Force of Laws/Nature?

*** Theory of Forms (Ionian Enchantment and Negative Trumping Positive?

A Round Table? ]

Allegory (4A)

Or gory][alley.

Subset [*]: anecdotal
anomoly? (not of the subset) Misuse of statistics or just plain not capable of using...

[Saved for Wilbur(C.Web)& from Alice** or the Tea Cup?]

[*] update 10-7-09 to McGaughey being taken to the Tool Shed and more apocrypha and astroturf

[** 10-7-09] note: this is Rep. Alan Grayson questioning the Federal Reserve Inspector General(this literary reference is to the meeting of the minds of the left and libertarian.) And here is Melanie Sloan of CREW a swifter of astroturf.]

Hardball

Follow-up to the Tool Shed 10 AM (PST)today:

Military style: Rumsfeld v. Gates
I don't know if I will find the quote but Rumsfeld noted his style of management as heated or open to heated dialogue. I will only contrast this with what I feel is a more healthy debate. Of course there is no debate as to whom is in charge. (Yeah right!) But I feel that reading between the lines is not so much the problem as actually reading some lines. The short answer? Not. I feel that the actual strategy may be not as much a push back to the administration but a pulling forward (see "shared responsibility) in support of a more robust change. It should also be realized just who are rationals actor and who are less so. I won't characterize any groups by even saying "them" or "us" but I mean those that see violence as the primary tool. And what is military strategy is no longer just in the shadows.
[footnote: chain of command ]

THIS AFTERNOON:
Maj. General Eaton: "healthy debate"[*]
White House Leaving Afghanistan not an option.

Not to mention:
the leak last month.
[*][6-24-10: McChrystal(Chain of Command) labels added]

We are at the table.

"All politics is local." Thanks for the "Tip." Ms. Speaker.

Actually I was reminded of the source for this quote this evening and I bridge the irony of Ms-Representation in reflecting on the interpretations which R so academic.

[update: 10-5-09 Tool Shed posted, also references earlier updates [10:16 & 11:44 PM] at On War / Politics [under con...]

Update

[UNDER CONSTRUCTION]
[ Seattle P.I. ]
[ Seatlle Examiner ]
[ The Reporter ]
[ Seattle Times ]
[ The Big Blog ]
[ Hmmmmmm. ] [*]
[ --membmer? Re : -) ]
TODAY
Who are "the deciders"? David Sirota
Iran: More accomplished in one day of negotiations than in 8 years of threats Glenn Greenwald
The top 10 things you did not know about Iran Juan Cole

Tool Shed 10-2-09
the case we are in 10-2-09
{under glass} 10-2-09
Turning 10-2-09
10-1-09 Teeter Totter Ribble (a river and a cycle)
Under Over 9-30-09 [*] Hmmmm?
In Balance 9-30-09

Tool Shed

[held in draft posted 10 AM: 10-5-09 ]
[Banana Republic] Open Salon
Me: If John Perry was a involved in the Carter administration, it is no wonder it suffered.

Military style: Rumsfeld v. Gates
I don't know if I will find the quote but Rumsfeld noted his style of management as heated or open to heated dialogue. I will only contrast this with what I feel is a more healthy debate. Of course there is no debate as to whom is in charge. (Yeah right!) But I feel that reading between the lines is not so much the problem as actually reading some lines. The short answer? Not. I feel that the actual strategy may be not as much a push back to the administration but a pulling forward (see "shared responsibility) in support of a more robust change. It should also be realized just who are rationals actor and who are less so. I won't characterize any groups by even saying "them" or "us" but I mean those that see violence as the primary tool. And what is military strategy is no longer just in the shadows.
[footnote: chain of command ]

The Day After...

or rather Five Years Later.

While still bogged down (as in hoping to revel) in yesterday's speech,
I wish to remember five years ago today.
I was speechless apparently. [there was no post on my part that day but the month of March is linked here and April was a month(or some period) of other work.{***}]

(Speaking of segue...anachronistically)
Impeach* Bush!
I only regret that I have but one four letter word in that plea.

*Impeachment is an investigation process, whose path is its own success. Meaning it does not need to reach a conclusion to shed light and bring results, and could be as unlimited in scope as any so called press. [see so called The New Wave ]

RESOLVED.

{***} anachronistically asterisked [Meaning that bracketed material was inserted after the previous period which was later (note: there is no " ** " here but was there)]

[3-20-08: another speech As far as...speechless or even noted above here]
[3-26-08: Five years is long enough ]

Echoes of Past Presidents and Wars.

As congress has made Bush the decider with the Military Commission Act, now he has a plan to get out of Iraq, so says a Senator, he just cannot tell anyone.

Any similarity to Vietnam is just a coincidence and in the wrong order. Coverup led to war, leads to new laws, leads to plan to get out, to win an election.

October surprise? Not this time.

But the sharpest tool in the shed?
Trying to compare it to the Korean War which defined the Cold War which we won.
Let's see the Korean war was a win because we won the Cold War but now North Korea has nuclear capabilities, and so does Pakistan and how many other's during the Cold War? Just what will be the questions when we win "in a new and 'different kind of war, an insurgent war' against Islamic fascists."?

The question now should be an echo of an earlier Bush on security and the economy.
"Are we better off now than we were 6 years ago"? OK, I tweaked it a bit.

MAY DAY IN PEORIA!

Disenfranchisement of Labor: Nothing New.
"The whole nation is interested that the best use shall be made of these Territories. We want them for homes of free white people. This they cannot be, to any considerable extent, if slavery shall be planted within them. Slave States are places for poor white people to remove from, not to remove to. New free States are the places for poor people to go to, and better their condition. For this use the nation needs these Territories." (Italics included,p.111-112) *

Not necessarily in May, nor politically correct, but these are the words of Abraham Lincoln in Peoria in 1847.

Lincoln had other interesting comments on issues that could shed light on our direction or needed course change or that there actually may be something new. Namely that if labor is not a right, then it is a substance whose abuse should be penalized, or the flow of both Manifest Destiny and Freedom are ebbing.**

HAPPY LAW AND ORDER DAY!
What was started in American was supplanted by power.
That is the same old thing.

* Hint: to update this reading replace the interest groups of Lincoln's time with labor, immigrants, corporations, and whatever needs or territory means?

** Things would be interesting if either Lincoln or FDR had made even more progress, not that loyal oppositition is not worthy, or at least it should be.